Me too! I think it is a bit confusing... the wording still gets me sometimes, even after months on the site I think oldest/newest would be clearer!

9:23:53 am
UCT
47
online
9:23:53 am
UCT
47
online
I can't be the only one who finds it confusing that listings can be sorted from "earliest" to "latest". Perhaps better terminology would be "oldest" to "newest" or "most recent" to "least recent" or something to that effect, because earliest to latest sort of can mean either thing? Like, latest could mean most or least recent (i.e "the latest fashion trends" (indicating early/right now/the present) vs "the latest contestant comes in last" (indicating lateness or last place)) so it tends to confuse me quite a bit. Am I the only one?